Sitting in a bar and grill in Winslow, Arizona, I overheard a long table of women talking about the Affordable Care Act – Obamacare – during a lunchtime birthday celebration. My heart soared to hear ordinary women debating the merits of the law, regardless of whether I agreed with points made or not.
What struck me most about the table of women talking was how free, open and pragmatic the conversation seemed to be. There was intense energy around the opinions shared, about household budgets and how the law may affect them. Hugs all around ended the luncheon. I have the sneaking suspicion that if left to that table of diverse Arizona women, a lot of America’s problems could be solved.
Moving such dialogue from U.S. tables to the broader public sphere, however, is both easier and scarier than before. With advanced technologies we can share opinions in a myriad of ways. This inCourage Reflections blog is my way of sharing some of what I think and feel, and sharing what Main Street women I interviewed lifted out as critical issues in their lives and for our nation.
Some of the women I interviewed want to make sure that I don’t attribute quotes to them as they’re worried it will impact their lives (mainly their work lives) adversely. I’m extremely sensitive to this and that sensitivity was heightened recently when in a work context, I was asked to provide every social media platform I participate in. I wondered, should I have censored what I written thus far? Should I cull what I say in the book?
Over the past decade or so, we’ve watched ordinary Main Streeters get arrested for assembling and expressing their opinions: teachers in Wisconsin, Moral Mondays demonstrators in North Carolina and Occupy Wall Street activists across the nation. This year, revelations about our government’s surveillance practices set not only other nations’ leaders on edge, but raised questions about what’s happening here at home.
The U.S. branch of PEN International, an organization dedicated to defending free expression and advancing literary culture, released a report last week: Chilling Effects: NSA Surveillance Drives U.S. Writers to Self-Censor . PEN American Center surveyed over five hundred U.S. writers, including novelists, journalists, essayists, poets, and nonfiction writers. Oh yes, and bloggers.
A full 85% of the writers surveyed said that recently disclosed American surveillance practices are having a chilling effect on what they write. Seventy-three percent “have never been as worried about privacy rights and freedom of the press as they are today.”
Writers said that they are engaging in self-censorship by avoiding research on certain controversial topics, choosing not to engage in sensitive conversations, and declining to pursue particular topics and stories when doing so might lead to scrutiny by the U.S. government.
“Chilling” on Main Street has taken on new meaning to me after reading PEN’s report. I sure want those conversations, those debates like the one I heard in Winslow, to flow freely – and in written form. Don’t you?
Learn more about PEN American Center’s Chilling Effects report at: http://www.pen.org/press-release/2013/11/13/pen-american-center-report-shows-impact-nsa-surveillance-american-writers#sthash.FoxsULZU.dpuf . Download the report at: http://pen.org/chilling-effects#sthash.FoxsULZU.dpuf.